On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. Someday > > these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :) > > Non-free is for GNU documentation.
I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up non-free in a couple of sub-categories. Personally, I'd prefer "fsf-free", but "non-free-docs" would be just as good, besides "non-free-firmware" and "non-free" for the rest. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
