On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:52:59AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >In the former case FTP masters are wasting their time, in the latter >case their role is indeed useful to "defend" our mirror tenants, but >then copyright reviews must be *intensified*. > >Have we ever asked SPI lawyers about who is legally responsible for >archive content? >(Cc-ing leader, if we haven't, I'm asking him to do that.)
AFAICS we've always taken the view that the ftpmaster team are responsible for the legality of the archive. I don't know if there was ever any strict legal advice behind that view. I can ask if you want, but we already have 2 questions in the pipeline with lawyers through SPI so it may take a while to get a response. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
