On 02/07/09 at 12:05 -0700, Richard Hecker wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >Richard Hecker wrote: > >>While consensus might exist that eliminating bureaucracy is good, > >>division of labor can be a good thing too. I do not think you have > >>established the need to combine the FD and DAM tasks. Are you > >>claiming the DAMs are too bureaucratic? > > > >No, what is bureaucratic is having to wait one month for FD to review > >one application, just to say `hey it's complete`, and pass it to the > >DAM. Then wait another month. I don't see the point in it being > >reviewed twice if FD has no say in the final decision and his only > >task is to check that everything is complete. > > In this community, do you really want to suggest we have too many eyes > looking for problems?
Seriously, Richard. You became a DD in 2001, and since then, you have only done 17 uploads on 3 different packages (last one in 2007, on the only package you maintain: set6x86). Emilio isn't a DD yet, and has already been in the Changed-By: field of 80 uploads. And given that for most of them it was work done inside the GNOME team, he probably touched a lot more packages. Don't you think that there's some sense in listening to what Emilio says, whithout immediately minimizing his arguments, since he has already been at least 4 times more useful to Debian than you were during the last 8 years? - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org