Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:40, Luk Claes<l...@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Why doing a 12 months release "to get into the new schedule" instead of
>>> just adopting a 24 months schedule based on the lenny release? [1]
>> The main reason is that the Release Team hopes to now have the momentum to
>> make a time based freeze work. If we would delay, it will very probably mean
>> that many developers 'forget' about what the time based freeze is about.
>
> How about using this opportunity to help fulfill the Shuttleworth
> dream of freezing both Ubuntu LTS and Debian at the same time? He self
> mentioned he's willing to reach a 'compromise' if Debian or another
> major distro is willing to co-operate, that is if it's willing to
> freeze the same upstream versions of key components (Linux, X, GNU
> toolkit, ...).
The only reason for this dream is to make sure that Debian fixes the Ubuntu bugs
for free.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
