Hi! * Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> [2010-07-14 02:14:12 CEST]: > Le Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Hector Oron a écrit : > > I would also like to point you to http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=58 > > I am sure that we could achieve the suggested goal, which is to have a port > ready and in a good shape when an architecture turns mainstream, if we were > following a strategy similar to what is suggested on the following page of > Fedora's wiki: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/SecondaryArchitectures
Isn't that what <http://www.debian-ports.org/> is about, being second class architectures? > In situations where nobody volunteers to do the work of porting leaf packages > for scientific computation on embedded arches where nobody will use them, my > conclusion is that it would be harmless for the ports to ignore the package > completely. Such architectures are moved off the main pool and to debian-ports, at least that's what was my understanding and what I perceived in the last years. So long, Rhonda -- "Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte." -- http://www.karriere.at/artikel/884/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100714073347.ga12...@anguilla.debian.or.at
