On Friday 07 January 2011 10:41:46 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Also, we should probably send out a sort of "call for implementation" of > the present draft, as it would be nice to have working code, as well > as policy integration, before moving DEP5 to ACCEPTED. In this case, > working code should probably look like parsers and/or generators. AFAIR > we used to have at least 2 such implementations for DEP5: > > - a config-model DEP5 description
I'll update DEP5 description (aka Debian::Dpkg::Copyright model [1]) as soon as I've stabilised the latch batch of modifications in config-model. As always, comments and feedback on this implementation are welcome :-) All the best [1] http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/DDUMONT/Config-Model-1.226/lib/Config/Model/models/Debian/Dpkg/Copyright.pl http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/DDUMONT/Config-Model-1.226/lib/Config/Model/models/Debian/Dpkg/Copyright/Content.pl http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/DDUMONT/Config-Model-1.226/lib/Config/Model/models/Debian/Dpkg/Copyright/License.pl Dominique -- http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101071110.00439.dominique.dum...@hp.com