On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:01:16AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > This is probably going to require a 2:1 majority requirement as > > written. > > Do you agree that the intent can be achieved by something requiring a > 1:1 majority ? If so, can you please say how. > > If you're going to say we need to replace "the TC resolution is > amended" with something like "we wish that instead the TC had decided > blah", then please reconsider. That would force the GR to avoid > saying what its own effect is, which is unnecessarily confusing. > Also, writing that text is very cumbersome.
The text currently says it's using the TC's power to decide something, and so would fall under 4.1.4. I think the intent of this GR is not to override the TC's decision about the default, so I'm currently not sure what to suggest. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140302112246.ga2...@roeckx.be