Hi -project,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> You do understand that we have procedured at Debian to handle stuff
> like GR proposals, right? And that procedure involves posting to
> debian-vote, so doing that was the right thing to do.
Whilst researching for a reply to a different post in this thread on -user (the
thread sadly spans at least three lists), I realised that the constitution
doesn't say where GRs should be announced, and I couldn't find any advice on
the subject in a scan over policy, either.
I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced. ("Should", I
suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
In this particular case I saw the GR thread on -project, rather than -vote,
iirc.
Unless I'm mistaken, a change to Constitution (to include a reference to where
GRs should be posted) would need to be achieved via GR.
Alternatively, we could document it as a "should" in policy, although there may
not yet be an appropriate section to do so.
Does anyone have strong feelings on this?
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141013183043.ga29...@chew.redmars.org
