On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:32:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced.
> > ("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
> 
> I think we don't need to name the place in the constitution. I don't
> think we need a hard rule about where the announcement happens.
> 
> I do, however, think it would be good to announce all proposed GRs on
> debian-devel-announce and debian-vote, with Reply-To to debian-vote.
> This would ensure all DDs hear about every proposed GR. There's not
> enough of them to cause a lot of d-d-a traffic. If the proposer of a
> GR forgets to do that, the secretary or some other DD could do it for
> them.

If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
debian-devel-announce.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141014071727.ga5...@roeckx.be

Reply via email to