On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:32:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced. > > ("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must"). > > I think we don't need to name the place in the constitution. I don't > think we need a hard rule about where the announcement happens. > > I do, however, think it would be good to announce all proposed GRs on > debian-devel-announce and debian-vote, with Reply-To to debian-vote. > This would ensure all DDs hear about every proposed GR. There's not > enough of them to cause a lot of d-d-a traffic. If the proposer of a > GR forgets to do that, the secretary or some other DD could do it for > them.
If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I will announce that the GR process has been sarted on debian-devel-announce. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141014071727.ga5...@roeckx.be