On Feb 16 2015, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: >> I haven't seen any followup from the tech ctte on some of the disucssion from >> Dec about improving the way the ctte approaches requests, cf >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/12/msg00050.html >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/12/msg00069.html >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/12/msg00075.html >> >> Improvements there might help with the DPL's workload, in so far as that >> involves dealing with arguments over technical things. > > I have a very different view of the TC to Anthony (and to those otehrs > who have suggested that the TC should be less quick to decide, or less > definite). > > My view is probably best summarised here: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/12/msg00098.html > > And exemplified by my very trenchant comments (un-rebutted!) here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766708#305
I'm a little confused by this: | IMO the committee has utterly failed to discharge its responsibility | here. If I had still been on the committee I would have pushed for a | swift vote to overrule. This bug was filed on Oct 25. The init system GR voting ended on Nov 18th, and I think you resigned a few days later. It seems to me there was at least some time available to push for a vote... On the other hand, I can't help but see an eery similary to #741573, where one maintainers actions are also blocking other people's hard work. In that bug, however, you seemto the main force preventing a swift vote. Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87h9ulpvfv....@thinkpad.rath.org