Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:35:02 +0200 with message-id <504dec86.9050...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#685939: unblock: bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #685939, regarding unblock: bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-7 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bouncycastle It appears on my radar because it was pending in unstable without testing migration for at least 6 months and 4 packages in wheezy FTBFS because of this package failing to migrate to unstable : #684841, #684829, #684815 and #684826 I've uploaded a package with fixed Build-Depends and requested removal of -gcj packages in kfreebsd-* archs. Changelog : bouncycastle (1.46+dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.3: no changes needed. * As per Java Policy, remove "Depends: default-jre | java2-runtime" and "Suggests: java-virtual-machine" from library packages: only programs need explicit depends on runtime. * Force a Build-Depends on default-jdk (>= 1:1.6) to indicate that this package needs some classes (like java.security.spec.ECFieldF2m) which are not available in GCJ classpath (Closes: #678904). * Remove Build-Depends on quilt and debian/README.source file since we already use quilt (3.0) source format. unblock bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-7 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvansignature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 26/08/12 22:38, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:Please unblock package bouncycastle It appears on my radar because it was pending in unstable without testing migration for at least 6 months and 4 packages in wheezy FTBFS because of this package failing to migrate to unstable : #684841, #684829, #684815 and #684826There was already an unblock request for this one. Please see #684963. (and please check before filing new bugs). The other submitter asks permission for an upload in t-p-u though. Given the diff between Wheezy's and Sid's bouncycastle, it is pretty clear that 1.46+dfsg-7 won't make it to Wheezy… unless you have very strong arguments. I'm closing this bugreport. Please feel free to follow-up on #684963. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---