On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 14:02 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > Awesome! Does libruby-extras sound like a good name?
Please bear in mind, just as Paul says so in a reply, collection packages are needed for a good global description, containing a good identifier for every lib inside it. Example, have you ever thought on a RSS Ruby library? Well, it is _inside_ libruby but nothing indicates it (filling a wishlist or minor bug would be a good thing for this, actually), nor short/long descriptions or README file contains a related 'rss' keyword. Just my 2 pesos cents :) -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ Programming is like sex: one mistake and you're providing support for a lifetime. GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
