On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:59:30PM -0400, shawn wilson wrote: >> On Apr 14, 2014 11:01 AM, "Chris Bannister" <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:55:04AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> > > On 4/13/2014 10:03 PM, Chris Bannister wrote: >> > > ... >> > > > considering it is a catastrophe worse than the Y2K bug. >> > > >> > > This is several orders of magnitude less severe than Y2K. >> > >> > I read https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/04/heartbleed.html >> > "Catastrophic" is the right word. On the scale of 1 to 10, this is an >> > 11" >> > >> > So I gathered, perhaps wrongly, that in that case the Y2K bug would have >> > to be greater than 11 on a scale of 1 to 10. >> > >> >> No we're using hex based scales now. And how this works is when someone >> tries to be stupid and rate something a 17, it rotates into being a 0. > > You'd be better of emailing Mr Schneier on that one. >
You're going to blame someone else for your (quite literal) +1 on their comment. OK :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAH_OBic6Q=S4Zygi=2srfsw3tmnenn7u6941m2abkvfmeob...@mail.gmail.com