On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:28:30PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > The use cases I gave are just examples, I could think in other > examples to show you the fact that they being invariant prevents it > from fitting in a particular need, but that's not what's going to > make us move forward...
I understand you point but I really belive that it is impossible to think out better examples than the examples you already gave. I am positive that if it is at all possible to think out interesting example for a task that can not be solved because of the features of GFDL then the same task could not be solved with some other license that we already accept as free. > This was what I tried to show you, not the opposite. My interpretation > of DFSG3 is guided by freedom 1, which says "adapt it to your needs". > Invariant sections are a restriction not covered by it. I still belive that my interpretation of DFSG3 is the same as yours. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]