Hubert Chathi writes ("Re: Tentative summary of the amendments"):
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:09:18 -0700, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> said:
> > I believe Ian's intended reading is that a package that depends on
> > uselessd | systemd (but does not work with sysvinit) would be allowed
> > by his proposal.
>
> I would hope that this would not be allowed by Ian's proposal until
> uselessd is also in Debian. In particular, "work with one alternative
> init system", I think, *should* imply that the alternative init system
> is in Debian.
Yes; I didn't spell that out because I thought it would be obvious.
By `in Debian' in this context we probably mean `in testing and not RC
buggy'.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21577.6432.212142.66...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
