Hmm, well. what do you think should be our next steps? I am not a big writer, so i am not really a big fan of writing documentation :-) also the security stuff is nice, but i guess that there are other issues scratching right now, right?
> > > Hello, > > since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can > > spend more time now on depot. > > right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are some > > :TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should we > > change this? > > Depot has a concept of namespaces (QName stolen from the WS folks) which > basically allows a name within a URI, identified by a prefix. This is used > in a bunch of places when a name alone isn't unique. For example say we > wants the 'depot jars' or the 'depot source' we'd want to have jars:depot > or > source:depot both with the name 'depot'. > > The main intention of this class is to define a few types (as namespaces), > for jar or docs or source or ... (hence the todos). Right now we are > trying > to get off the ground with jars. > > I'd leave the TODOs but I'd not worry about it too much. > > regards > > Adam >
