Okay, you have caught my interest.
However, to avoid build error
conflicting declaration 'typedef int BOOL'
in at least odbcconfig.cxx, I have been patching the distributed source
by blanking out the line
typedef int BOOL;
from my (Ubuntu Hardy) /usr/include/iodbcunix.h and copying the result
to the two files
connectivity/inc/iodbcunix.h
dbaccess/inc/iodbcunix.h.
Does this impact the value of my tests? Should I mention it in any
contribution to any issue? (I have also patched
svl/source/misc/inettype.cxx as per issue 109146 (cws sb121) and
sv/source/filter/asc/parasc.cxx for issue 109179 (own improvisation).
Could these be relevant to Base?)
Of course, if it is obvious that I should be building differently, all
suggestions are welcome.
Cheers,
Terry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@dba.openoffice.org
