On 3/18/2010 12:18 PM, Terrence Enger wrote:
Okay, you have caught my interest.
Hi Terry,
Excellent - not nearly as good as your email though.
Kind looks like something to coax Ocke out for a comment, actually...but
However, to avoid build error
conflicting declaration 'typedef int BOOL'
in at least odbcconfig.cxx, I have been patching the distributed source
by blanking out the line
typedef int BOOL;
from my (Ubuntu Hardy) /usr/include/iodbcunix.h and copying the result
to the two files
connectivity/inc/iodbcunix.h
dbaccess/inc/iodbcunix.h.
Does this impact the value of my tests? Should I mention it in any
contribution to any issue?
(I have also patched
svl/source/misc/inettype.cxx as per issue 109146 (cws sb121) and
sv/source/filter/asc/parasc.cxx for issue 109179 (own improvisation).
Could these be relevant to Base?)
took a quick look - Question: You think that your patch got in because
of the emails, or you are asking if you should submit the patchs?
For the next hour need to attend else where -
So a little intermission music till I get back
http://baseanswers.com/blues_intermizzio.ram
Drew
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@dba.openoffice.org
