Robin Jarry, Jun 10, 2025 at 16:53: > Currently, for the TRIE algorithm (actually, it should be called > DIR-24-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8), the tbl8 group is freed even though the > readers might be using the tbl8 group entries. The freed tbl8 group can > be reallocated quickly. As a result, lookup may be performed > incorrectly. > > To address that, RCU QSBR is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclamation. > > Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <[email protected]> > --- > > Notes: > This is a semi-copy-paste of the FIB4 implementation. > > I couldn't understand the implementation of trie_modify with regard to > depth_diff handling. > > The unit tests fail because depth_diff is always 0 when deleting a route > which causes any subsequent add to fail with a -ENOSPC error. > > Vladimir, could you give some more insights on the matter?
Gentle bump. Hi Vladimir, could you have a look? Thanks! -- Robin > Not recommended for children.
