On 5/4/07, Rana Dasgupta wrote:
Hi,
 We have published two different snapshots for 32 bit Linux builds
with libstdc++.so.5 and so.6, but only so.6 snapshots with 64 bit
builds. I understand that this was a problem for a couple of users
using slightly older versions of gcc. so.5 and so.6 is more a toolset
and not a platform issue, and unfortunately 64 bit does not seem to
imply new toolsets etc.

Hi Rana,

Linux snapshots are built with libstd++.so.5. In [1][2] threads
building with libstd++.so.6 was discussed and for M1 we published x86
snapshots with both dependencies.
In [3] Tim suggested to do only the libstdc++v6 builds but we haven't
discussed it yet.

[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

[2]http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

[3]http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

Thanks,
Stepan.

 It's quite likely that we have discussed this already on other
threads, and I was not following along.

Thanks,
Rana


On 4/29/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/30/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/29/07, Tim Ellison wrote:
> > > Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > On 4/29/07, Tim Ellison wrote:
> > > >> It looks like a number of people have been testing the stable build
> > > >> candidate (thanks to everyone!) and so far it seems that there are no
> > > >> show stoppers for declaring this a good stable build.  It's our best so
> > > >> far, albeit with known problems etc.
> > > >>
> > > >> Unless anything serious come to light by tomorrow, I suggest we declare
> > > >> this our M1, and reopen the code for ongoing development.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Does it make sense to rebuilding M1 with debug info in class files
> > > > included?
> > >
> > > Yes, if you could upload a new set of builds at the current repository
> > > state that would be great.  That would include the debug info now, and
> > > no additional functional change.  We can look at refining the JRE vs JDK
> > > info after M1.
> > >
> >
> > OK. I'm going to create snapshots for r533500.
> >
>
> Done
>
> > -Stepan.

--
Stepan Mishura
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Reply via email to