Simply doesn't work! The svn info command will complin it is not a working directory. -Bruno
2009/2/3 Tim Ruppert <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> > Just wondering - what happens when you've done an export instead of a co? > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Bruno Busco" <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Better looking into this I am trying to implement a much simpler > > solution: > > I have changed the ant svninfo task to create a svninfo.xml file with > > all > > SVN info. It looks like this: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <info> > > <entry > > kind="dir" > > path="." > > revision="740301"> > > <url>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk</url> > > <repository> > > <root>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf</root> > > <uuid>13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68</uuid> > > </repository> > > <wc-info> > > <schedule>normal</schedule> > > </wc-info> > > <commit > > revision="740301"> > > <author>buscob</author> > > <date>2009-02-03T13:26:11.171854Z</date> > > </commit> > > </entry> > > </info> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I need now the ant task to extract the entry revision (and may be the > > url) > > attributes from this file and append it into a simple text file that > > is > > included in the footer.ftl > > > > Does somebody know how to have an ant task read a tag attribute and > > then > > write it to a textfile? > > Many thanks, > > Bruno > > > > > > 2009/2/3 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > > > > > Thanks Bruno, > > > > > > Yes, like you I think we should consider more seriously this issue. > > > Maybe your requirements (Subversion) in > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700?focusedCommentId=12586148#action_12586148are > > already satisfied on the main demo server (please someone can answer > > > here) ? They are on my alternate dermo server. I just tested (merged > > easily) > > > it works well. > > > Some points though, bsh -> groovy, Some i18n needed in svninfo.txt > > > One question : I don't think we should put this in hot-deploy, > > should we ? > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > From: "Bruno Busco" <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> A patch is available in > > >> *OFBIZ-2164<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2164> > > >> * > > >> -Bruno* > > >> * > > >> 2009/2/3 Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> > > >> > > >> OK, I will move to the footer. > > >>> > > >>> BTW for the SVN info, could we think to use the patch included > > here? * > > >>> OFBIZ-1700 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700> > > >>> > > >>> * > > >>> With this change a new ant target was added to run the svn info > > command > > >>> and > > >>> the results were available to be shown in an "about" application. > > >>> May be now a better implementation could be to have the svn info > > >>> generated > > >>> string available in a portlet. > > >>> WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> -Bruno > > >>> ** > > >>> 2009/2/2 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > > >>> > > >>> +1 for footer (and if we could have the release number it would be > > even > > >>> > > >>>> greater ;o) > > >>>> > > >>>> Jacques > > >>>> > > >>>> From: "David E Jones" <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Shouldn't that be the time the server thinks it is for the user, > > and > > >>>>> therefore something that we might want visible to the user just > > in > > >>>>> case > > >>>>> their time zone setting is off or something? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Of course, it doesn't need to be in the header... I like the > > footer > > >>>>> better personally for less critical/useful info like that. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -David > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If we need information on the server there is the log in > > webtools. I > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> can't see why an end user would be interested by server time, > > but I > > >>>>>> may be > > >>>>>> wrong... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Jacques > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On a second thought... are we sure this is not usefull to know > > the > > >>>>>>> server's > > >>>>>>> time? > > >>>>>>> If this is not the case and there are not objections I can > > remove it. > > >>>>>>> -Bruno > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 2009/2/1 Bilgin Ibryam <bibr...@iguanait.com> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In case my vote was not very clear: + 1 to remove it > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> + 1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Bilgin > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I just realise that we have a date/time in header. Does it > > make > > >>>>>>>>> sense to > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> have this here ? > > >>>>>>>>>> Time (and even date) is not updated and each modern OS > > provides > > >>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>> information in some taskbar anyway. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jacques > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> >
