OK, so Bilgin was right, I will deprecate but will also move it to commonext. Do you know what I should put in the see tag? If
someone wants to implement the new version... At least
a link for now should be enough...
/**
* @deprecated
* @see #????
*/
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
I did some brief looking on their site and they are definitely deprecated to
their new ones. I'd deprecate it and then remove it
before the next release - just to be safe.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi BIlgin,
But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable...
Jacques
From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <bibr...@gmail.com>
I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time.
Bilgin
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux
<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he
could still find it in one of the releases...
Jacques
From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote:
We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be
using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable
notice (like waiting a while for comment).
On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed
or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might as
well remove them right away.
-David
On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Everybody agree?
Jacques
From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could
drop it all together.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather
in commonext. It looks like an application util to me.
Jacques
