Hi, On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:13:14AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I have finalized a script that can analyze an object's history > and determine if certain edits are "non-edits" (i.e. nothing of note > was changed at all), or "harmess" (i.e. the object was changed and > might have to be rolled back if the contributor does not agree to > the license change, but the rollback will likely not affect the > quality much). > > [...] > > You can try out my script here, by adding a way/node/relation id to > the URL like so: > > http://wtfe.gryph.de/harmless/way/40103577 > > The output is a break-down of what my script thinks has happened to > the object, and which edits are zero-edits ("severity: 0") or > harmless ("severity: 1"). After the version analysis, it summarizes > the user contributions - each user is afforded the highest severity > of all his changes.
There is a small oddity: when a non-agreeing user deleted an object then the script notes that down as a zero-edit and ignores the fact that the object is gone. Example: http://wtfe.gryph.de/harmless/node/1300187843 see history: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1300187843/history Might happen only if there are no tags. I'm also slightly confused by the user summary. What do 'relevant change' and 'no change' mean? I would have expected 'relevant change' to be only those that are non-zero edits by non-agreers but that does not seem to be the case. Sarah _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
