> Well, I'm catching up with the guts of 1.x and 2.x at the same time, > that's what I see in 1.x: > > SV * > dir_config(r, key=NULL, ...) > Apache r > char *key > > ALIAS: > Apache::Server::dir_config = 1 > > so you can call dir_config on $r or $s if I understand > correctly. So any > request can change a configuration of the server's setvar's. well if they are aliased then they are literally the same function, right? so we're still not talking separate configs, since they point to the same data... I'm not through with my second bowl of coffee yet, though :) --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Philippe M . Chiasson
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Stas Bekman
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Philippe M . Chiasson
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Stas Bekman
- RE: :Table::get implementation? Geoffrey Young
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Stas Bekman
- RE: :Table::get implementation? Geoffrey Young
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Stas Bekman
- RE: :Table::get implementation? Geoffrey Young
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Stas Bekman
- RE: :Table::get implementation? Geoffrey Young
- RE: :Table::get implementation? Geoffrey Young
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Doug MacEachern
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Doug MacEachern
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Doug MacEachern
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Doug MacEachern
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Ken Williams
- Re: :Table::get implementation? Doug MacEachern
