On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > which of course will be by default / "for free" since 'FETCH' is just an > > alias for 'get'. > > But, FETCH is aliased to apr_table_get! So it always returns a single > value. argh, this thread is driving me nutz. i know that. do you not see the word 'will be' and my first reply to this thread? i will look at the code later. Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:06:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: APR::Table::get implementation? In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i'm confused by the confusion here. all that's need is to implement a mpxs_APR__Table_get that has the same logic as 1.x FETCH/get has. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
