Alexander Pavlovic wrote: > Hello dev list, > > We are having a bit of debate at work as to what framework we should use > for testing modperl enabled modules, i.e. writing module test cases > intiated > by make test. Apache::test seems to work quite nicely it even pushes your > local blib path automatically onto @INC, however other people are > suggesting the new Apache::Test. Could anyone comment on this a bit > further ?
Alex, I've already answered this question when Clayton has asked me; You win in a long run if you plan to port your code to run under 2.0. Apache::Test is pretty stable and getting better and featureful every day, Apache::test is in support mode == no new features will be added (just like any other module in mod_perl 1.x). Also since Apache::Test is being actively developed you have a chance to influence its features by sending patching or just suggestions, if they are useful. I suppose there are many other things that can be said, but I think planning for the future is a major one. _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
