On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: [ ... ] > I just think of Util:: as the > most appropriate name. I don't want us having an endless argument on this > small naming issue. I'm open for suggestions if you have any other > appropriate name for that category.
Utilities? or Utils? That indicates one of many ... This is a difficult category, as, in of itself, adding such a category to a distribution with a single module doesn't really tell one more about what the module does (to some degree, the same can be said of an 'Application'-like category). It's almost like a 'Miscellaneous' category, in some sense; it indicates that the module doesn't belong in any of the other categories. -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
