On 11/25/05, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Craig. I disagree but that's okay; I find identifying other actions > by names makes perfect > sense and is the logical outcome of development.
I think passing results "by name" instead of "by value" is what gets you in trouble in the first place :-). The idea was spawned by the ease of Spring which > I can reference anything else by a name. Anyhow, if you have time, I think > your answer should be > appeneded to the bug request so that we can perpetually keep your > explanation. I'll go ahead and do that. Paul Craig
