[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212682#comment-15212682
 ] 

Bob Briody commented on TINKERPOP-1078:
---------------------------------------

Fair enough. Not really following this comment then:

{quote} I believe (moving forward too) that explain() and profile() should have 
the same steps in them. {quote}

Regardless, I stick by what I said about profile step. It's a diagnostic tool, 
not a regular traversal step (from the user's perspective).

> Do not include TraversalMetrics cap in profile results.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.1-incubating
>            Reporter: Bob Briody
>              Labels: breaking
>             Fix For: 3.2.0-incubating
>
>
> _As a user profiling a traversal, I am likely to cap the TraversalMetrics 
> results, but I don't actually want that Step included in my profile._
> When the TraversalMetrics are cap'd off the end of the traversal the .cap() 
> Step should be excluded from the metrics and timers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to