[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212682#comment-15212682 ]
Bob Briody commented on TINKERPOP-1078: --------------------------------------- Fair enough. Not really following this comment then: {quote} I believe (moving forward too) that explain() and profile() should have the same steps in them. {quote} Regardless, I stick by what I said about profile step. It's a diagnostic tool, not a regular traversal step (from the user's perspective). > Do not include TraversalMetrics cap in profile results. > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-1078 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: process > Affects Versions: 3.1.1-incubating > Reporter: Bob Briody > Labels: breaking > Fix For: 3.2.0-incubating > > > _As a user profiling a traversal, I am likely to cap the TraversalMetrics > results, but I don't actually want that Step included in my profile._ > When the TraversalMetrics are cap'd off the end of the traversal the .cap() > Step should be excluded from the metrics and timers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)