On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:04:40 -0400 Matthew Miller <mat...@mattdm.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36:42PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > We had a distro that was pretty general purpose, worked for servers > > and desktops and even laptops. We had a predictable schedule. We > > had new technology thanks to rawhide. We had timely bugfixes that > > didn't sacrifice stability, as in things didn't change out from > > under you on a stable release. We had an ecosystem of third parties > > that would build up stacks of newer things should a user be > > adventurous. We had a fresh release quite often that could be > > relied upon for at least a year. We had a culture of not just > > throwing crap over the wall at our users, which included ourselves. > > We had accountability when things did go awry and a honest effort > > to disrupt the users of our stable releases as little as possible. > > We also we're a very free distro avoiding nonfree stuff, and we > > worked well with upstreams. We we're easy to configure, easy to > > update, easy to install whether a single system or 400 systems in a > > lab. We we're easy to administrate in the same scenarios. > > This sounds like an excellent definition for what Fedora should be. <aol>Me too</aol> I would love to see us work back toward the above where we are no longer doing so. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
