On Sat, Jul 9, 2022, at 01:35, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 07. 22 0:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > In addition, I would ask of all of you to make sure all your packages have > > been > > added to the @rust-sig group on src.fedoraproject.org (at least with > > "commit" > > access), unless there is a very good reason not to do so (and if that is the > > case for a particular package on this list, I'd be interested in knowing the > > reason). > > Should we escalate this trough FESCo? It seems to me that this makes sense as > a > policy and the maintainers you list here are always the same (mostly > pbrobinson, salimma, ignatenkobrain).
I agree that FESCo should intervene and enforce (over time) the SIGs commit access on all packages that should be in the SIG scope. The same applies for golang SIG/packages, in fact I was planning to do the similar reminder tomorrow. Best, Fale -- Fabio Alessandro Locati fale.io _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
