On 8/14/22 04:42 PM, Christian Kujau wrote:
Rawhide n00b here, but struggling with:

-----------------------
$ dnf upgrade --assumeyes --releasever=rawhide zip

Since Fedora 37 has been branched, you need to grab the new Rawhide packages.  
Rawhide is now the future F38.  This should work:

dnf update fedora-gpg-keys --nogpgcheck
dnf update fedora-repos --release 38
dnf update --refresh

        Steve

[....]
[SKIPPED] zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded
Fedora rawhide - x86_64                                                         
                                                                                
        1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB     00:00
GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 
(0x5323552A) is already installed
The GPG keys listed for the "Fedora rawhide - x86_64" repository are already 
installed but they are not correct for this package.
Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing 
package is: zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64
  GPG Keys are configured as: 
file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful 
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: GPG check FAILED


$ rpm -K /var/cache/dnf/fedora*/packages/zip*.rpm --verbose
/var/cache/dnf/fedora-ebd04873699a984e/packages/zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64.rpm:
     Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID eb10b464: NOKEY
     Header SHA256 digest: OK
     Header SHA1 digest: OK
     Payload SHA256 digest: OK
     V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID eb10b464: NOKEY
     MD5 digest: OK
-----------------------

So, RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 is present (via 
"gpg-pubkey-5323552a-6112bcdc"), but rawhide packages appear to be signed with 
a key called 0xeb10b464 -- I could not find that key mentioned anywhere on the interwebs, 
what's going on here?

Also, the "zip" package is just an example, I was actually trying to "dnf 
system-upgrade" and that warning above was printed for every package. Yes, one could add 
--nogpgcheck, but that should not be needed, right?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to