On Mi, 21.12.22 06:27, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 6:23 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 20/12/2022 19:56, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Great. The gotcha though is this in effect requires a change in the file 
> > > system currently mounted at /boot, which is ext4. And ext4 isn't 
> > > supported by sd-boot or UEFI firmware. So if you're going to support 
> > > sd-boot, the installer needs to be aware that either the ESP is big 
> > > enough to be used as /boot, or if it's not big enough then it will be 
> > > mounted on /efi*and*  a new partition XBOOTLDR formatted as FAT will be 
> > > used as /boot.
> >
> > Nobody should use FAT for /boot. efifs[1] should be used instead.
> >
> > systemd-boot can load these drivers from ESP out of the box[2].
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/pbatard/efifs
> > [2]: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15617
>
> Indeed. We should not endeavor to create more problems by putting more
> stuff in the ESP. By doing so, we lose features and capabilities from
> our own native filesystem. No matter what boot manager we use, we
> should not be required to give that up. We already have efifs[1]
> packaged in Fedora, let's use that.

That's such a weird logic. /boot is supposed to contain data consumed
by the boot loader, not so much by the OS.

What do you think a boot laoder is going to do with access modes, file
ownership, selinux labels?

I am pretty sure we should reduce problems and simplify things by just
using VFAT for boot loader stuff, and put everything at the least
number of places possible.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to