On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:29:38PM +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:16:45 +0200,
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I agree. The scope of the issue is fairly narrow, and the underlying
> > issue is an invalid signature made by the anydesk maintainers.
> > We also have a simple command that users can use to work around
> > the issue.
> 
> If you are thinking of sq-keyring-linter, that won't help here.  This
> is not a SHA-1 issue.

I know. I mentioned neither of those two things ;)

The workaround I had in mind: add '--exclude-anydesk'.
We don't have a good replacement for graphical users yet, but I'm
sure we'll be able to write something up in CommonBugs before F38 is released.

> The issue (I think) is that the anydesk maintains were too aggressive
> in what they striped when they exported the OpenPGP certificate.
[snip]

Yes, probably. Anyway, the end result is that "based on the knowledge
that Sequoia has, the certificate was not valid when the signature was
made."   (This is based on your comment [1]. I'm reproducing this
here for others.)

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878#c124

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to