On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We only > report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc.
You wrote: > TLDR: This report[2] contains 73976 identified defects. and again above said they were "defects". Well, we know the ones in libvirt & QEMU are nearly all NOT defects, so don't use that word. > Please review the report and provide feedback. At 1 minute to look at each report, working 8 hours a day, that would take 154 working days. Constructively I would suggest YOU doing the following: (1) Examine a subset of the reports yourself. (2) Identity systematic issues, such as the attribute((cleanup)) issue that Dan pointed out, and work with the upstream toolchain to get those fixed (apparently the attribute((cleanup)) issue is / will be fixed already, so that's good). (3) If during this search you find what you think is an actual defect, file a bug with the upstream package. (4) Repeat steps (1)..(3) until the list is much, much smaller. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
