On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:47, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: >> The hard part is to define what the package tools should do in the >> different cases >> A depsolver need to work with real requirements, so it need to be defined >> in what cases that a soft requirement will become a real requirements to >> do the right thing > > See my proposal. >
My problem with your proposal is that it is not crazy enough. It is a lot of work for marginal gain and doesn't really bet the farm enough. I would prefer a proposal that Fedora 17 will be based off of Conary or .debs as it is crazy enough to work. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
