On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > The question is - why does having incompatible plan9 implementations of > > common commands make Fedora 'better', outside of "having more stuff"? > > > > You could say the same about most of Fedora packages. > > 'Better', giving people tools to use, to choose from. Fedora isn't one of > those > pure, minimalist distributions anyway. We have a lot of alternatives for a lot > of stuff. Some do more, some do less, some do the same but differently.
What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the ones that exist in Fedora already? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
