> From: Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> > > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed: > > > > > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no > > > longer active? > > > > A: The thread was started on a Friday night. > > > > B: Some people don't get to read mail every day, or more than a few or less > > times a week. > > > > A + B = perfectly justified timing of reply. > > C: the debate was taken to every place it could possibly go, and the > commit was reverted.
D: read mail, have knee jerk reaction, send email, read remainder of unread mail and realize A, B and C have already occurred and then decided it's best to read all unread mail before allowing knee to jerk the send button. > So what's the point of reviving it? Sometimes, if you don't get your > $0.02 posted in time, it's best to just sit on it. Agreed. -- John Florian
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
