On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
>> > That's the point. You don't get to be a primary architecture until
>> > you've demonstrated that doing so won't slow down the other
>> > architectures
>> Is that "you don't get to be a primary architecture unless you have
>> demonstrated that nobody outside of the ARM SIG needs to do any work
>> on the architecture" == "you don't get to be a primary architecture
>> unless it doesn't matter whether you are a primary architecture"?
>
> Promotion is supposed to benefit Fedora, not the architecture being
> promoted.
Yes, but that is _net_ benefit (benefit - cost). Requiring zero cost
to Fedora doesn't follow from that.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
