On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 January 2016 at 12:20, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham <nott...@splat.cc
>>>> <mailto:nott...@splat.cc>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing interpretations from a
>>>> CTO
>>>>     who's trying to sell me the thing they're talking about the
>>>>     licensing of.
>>>>
>>>>     We certainly could send that interpretation of CDDL/GPL and the
>>>>     kernel to the
>>>>     legal team... but I'm not sure they'd agree with it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, if Lawrence Livermore is doing it, and Canonical apparently plans
>>>> to do it, it probably would be a good idea to get a determination from
>>>> the legal team
>>>
>>>
>>> who is "Lawrence Livermore"?
>>>
>>
>> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is an organization founded by
>> the University of California to do research and development for
>> academic and government purposes. The US Department of Energy
>> commissioned them to port ZFS to Linux quite a long time ago[0], which
>> is the foundation of the current ZFS on Linux codebase.
>>
>> Please do some research before actually saying things.
>>
>
> Might be good if you did also :).
>
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is a US Government/Department
> of Energy laboratory that UC Berkeley has a hand in managing. It was
> not founded by the University of California but came out of the post
> Manhatten project to build the hydrogen bomb. The US DOE did not
> commission the lab to make the port. The port was done as part of a
> project to have a large scale filesystem work for certain computer
> clusters. That work got special permission from Sun but those
> permissions look to be sealed.
>
> Just because a port was done and then released does not mean that
> Lawrence Livermore is using it in any large way etc. There are
> thousands of projects that come out of these labs which maybe 3-20
> students, grad students and phd's worked on but aren't in any use.
> Most of them will get that file attached to them which doesn't mean
> that LLNL sactioned it, DOE commission it etc etc. It just means that
> it was done at the lab as part of some project and the law requires
> that the file is attached to it.
>

LLNL is still actively involved in the ZFS on Linux project, so they
are still doing something with it.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to