I must agree that "fedorainfracloud" also sounds to me like the more stable variant out of the two (without any previous historical knowledge).
clime On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:51:21 +0100 > Michael J Gruber <m...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Miroslav Suchy venit, vidit, dixit 14.03.2016 23:01: > > > There is ongoing discussion on Fedora Infrastructure mailing list, > > > that only fully supported services should remain in > > > fedoraproject.org domain. All experimental services should be moved > > > to fedorainfracloud.org. Recently there was suggestion to use > > > http://fedoracommunity.org/. So it is not settled down and the > > > resolution may change in near future. > > > > Going just by the names, I would expect "fedorainfracloud" to be the > > fedora infrastructure in the cloud, i.e. the infrastructure services > > that fedora relies on; and "fedoraproject" to be project work in > > progress. Just the other way round compared to the plan. > > Well, our cloud isn't setup with HA currently and is running a older > version of openstack, so it's not something we consider as solid as all > the normal virtual hosts running vm's for applications (and in most > cases in HA). We are working to upgrade it, but until we have things in > place it's just not as reliable as our regular infrastructure. > Additionally, things in our cloud are mostly development instances, > test machines, proof of concept, etc... ie, things that aren't really > supported. > > Anyhow, we are still discussing this on the infrastructure list, so > look for a more detailed and verbose explanation of things once thats > complete. > > kevin > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
