Ok, I will prepare libgit2 and related packages update in one week for f24.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:39 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >>> This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in > >>> f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by > >>> some other gnome packages. > >> > >> I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates > separately. > >> > >> Can you wait with this until we are out of the alpha freeze and gnome > >> 3.20.0 builds have gone stable? Like, until early next week or so? This > >> should give it a bit time to shake out any libgit2 bugs in rawhide too > >> before pushing it to F24. > > > > I am confused now, I thought libgit2-glib needed libgit 0.24.0 ? Or is > the > > libgit2-glib that needs the newer libgit2 not in the update yet? > > Right; a libgit2-glib 0.24.0 update would have to go out together with a > libgit2 update. I don't intend to include that in the GNOME 3.20.0 > megaupdate and would much prefer if we could do these separately. It's > just easier to QA if we can split up things a bit here. (Read: I don't > want subsurface or kate not working blocking my GNOME update going > stable :)) > > Thanks, > Kalev > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- -Igor Gnatenko
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
