James Browning via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>: > I have a branch 'control-denum' which takes a significantly wrong > approach and replaces many of the #define directives and replaces > them with a trio of enums. completely untested of course. IMO a > slightly less wrong solution might be to extend the table to have > a couple fields for a function pointer and an argument. (a quick > glimpse at the code suggest many cases are a relatively simple > print the variable with the format in the function. probably the > best route would be for me to shut up ow and let better minds chew > on it for a while.
I'm looking at table-extension now. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel