From: Glauber Costa <glom...@openvz.org>
Those structures are only used for memcgs that are effectively using
kmemcg. However, in a later patch I intend to use scan that list
inconditionally (list empty meaning no kmem caches present), which
simplifies the code a lot.
So move the initialization to early kmem creation.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glom...@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9d1245dc993a..deb5b9bb6188 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5210,8 +5210,6 @@ static int __memcg_activate_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
goto out_rmid;
memcg->kmemcg_id = memcg_id;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->memcg_slab_caches);
- mutex_init(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
/*
* We couldn't have accounted to this cgroup, because it hasn't got the
@@ -5958,6 +5956,9 @@ static int memcg_init_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
int ret;
memcg->kmemcg_id = -1;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->memcg_slab_caches);
+ mutex_init(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
+
ret = memcg_propagate_kmem(memcg);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
