On 04 Aug 2014, at 12:22, Adam Strzelecki <o...@java.pl> wrote: >> So, let's end this discussion and start focusing efforts towards building >> the solution. > > > Now let's focus on submitting patches :>
Before you do that, can you write up a proposal on what you want to accomplish and how to get there? There are multiple stake-holders (including me) who do not necessarily want to read through an email discussion and/or patches in order to see the big picture. I agree we should make Qt relocatable (with @rpath). I also think the current macdeployqt solution works adequately. There is one standing issue: code signing does not work on 10.9+. I would like to see this resolved before work on using @rpath begins. (I don’t work on the installer framework so I don’t have an opinion there.) Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
