On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:31:08PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:20:51AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:18:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:51:27AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > > > config SPI_QUP > > > > tristate "Qualcomm SPI Support with QUP interface" > > > > depends on OF > > > > depends on ARM > > > > Does this really depend on ARM? If so why? > > > The ARM dependency is there for the use of _relaxed io accessor > > variants. > > That's not ARM only and I thought we were getting generic versions of it > anyway? ARMv8, MIPS, Microblaze, Hexagon and SH also define it.
Okay, that's fair. I'm only vaguely familiar with the generic _relaxed variants, but until they land, how do we appropriately declare the dependency to prevent breaking COMPILE_TEST builds on architectures that don't have them? Or should we either bother? Do we need to introduce a HAVE_RELAXED_IO_ACCESSORS selected by those architectures with support? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
