Hi Lubomir,

On 15-03-17 10:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Eric Anholt wrote:

From: Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@v3.sk>

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@v3.sk>
Signed-off-by: Craig McGeachie <slap...@yahoo.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
---


v2: Split into a separate patch for submitting to the devicetree list.
     Consistently start node docs with a capital letter. device's
     address in the example shouldn't have "0x". Drop machine-specific
     interrupt numbers from the docs.  (changes by anholt).

v3: Move the file to just bcm2835-mbox.txt, clean up formatting
     (changes by anholt, from review by Lee Jones).

Thanks for fixing up.

.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt      | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt

I don't see any unruliness or causes of controversy.

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0bb2b9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt
I am trying to standarize all broadcom device tree bindings in the format "brcm,binding.txt".

Could you please rename this file to brcm,bcm2835-mbox.txt for consistency in bindings?

Regards,
 Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to