On 03/06/15 09:35, Zhou Wang wrote:
> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init. Also set pp->root_bus_nr = 0 in
> each PCIe host driver which is based on pcie-designware.
>
> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>> if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>> global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>> }
> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>
> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
> help to test it.
I have tested this on a 'Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Lite Board', which also
uses a designware pcie host controller (PCI_IMX6). Booted,
removed/rescanned the bus, then scanned for wireless access points using
the b43 driver. Please note my change below.
Tested-by: James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index 2e9f84f..b3f0ac7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
> #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 16)
> #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C
>
> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>
> static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>
> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
> -
> - return sys->private_data;
> -}
> -
> int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
> {
> *val = readl(addr);
> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int
> irq)
> static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
> {
> int irq, pos0, i;
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>
> pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
> order_base_2(no_irqs));
> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
> struct pci_dev *pdev,
> {
> int irq, pos;
> struct msi_msg msg;
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>
> if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller
> *chip, unsigned int irq)
> {
> struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>
> clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
> }
> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
> .map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
> };
>
> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
> struct of_pci_range range;
> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> + struct pci_bus *bus;
> struct resource *cfg_res;
> + LIST_HEAD(res);
> u32 val, na, ns;
> const __be32 *addrp;
> int i, index, ret;
> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> - dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
> - dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> + /*
> + * FIXME: we should really be able to use
> + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
> + * but the conversion needs some more testing
> + */
> + if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
> + pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
> + global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
> + global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
> + }
> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
> + pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
> + pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
I don't think this #ifdef is necessary. In the spirit of 'the conversion
needs some more testing', I removed it leaving just the below arm64 code.
This worked on my Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Lite Board, I went as far as
scanning for wireless access points.
> +#else
> + ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources expects &pp->io_base to be a
resource_size_t*, but &io_base is u64*. This generates a warning on arm
with the above change. Changing the the type in
drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h fixes this.
Thanks,
James
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +#endif
> +
> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
> + pp, &res);
> + if (!bus)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> + bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
> +#else
> + bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
> #endif
>
> - dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> - dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
> + pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> + if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
> + pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>
> - pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> + /* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
> + pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> +#endif
> +
> + pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
> + pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
> static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
> int size, u32 *val)
> {
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
> int ret;
>
> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32
> devfn, int where,
> static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
> int where, int size, u32 val)
> {
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
> int ret;
>
> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> .write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
> };
>
> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - struct pcie_port *pp;
> -
> - pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> -
> - if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
> - sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
> - pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
> - global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
> - sys->io_offset);
> - }
> -
> - sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
> - pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
> -
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - struct pci_bus *bus;
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> -
> - pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
> - &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
> - if (!bus)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> -
> - if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
> - pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
> -
> - return bus;
> -}
> -
> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> -{
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
> - int irq;
> -
> - irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
> - if (!irq)
> - irq = pp->irq;
> -
> - return irq;
> -}
> -
> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
> - .setup = dw_pcie_setup,
> - .scan = dw_pcie_scan_bus,
> - .map_irq = dw_pcie_map_irq,
> -};
> -
> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> u32 val;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
