I tried the i386 and i686 versions and the same thing happened. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gordon Rowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:11 AM Subject: Re: FW: [e-smith-devinfo] Samba add user fragment
> I decided that since I was testing freeswan that I might as well install the > latest version, so I tried the i586 version. The upgrade worked on a single > processor SME5, but on an SMP CPU I received this smp kernel error. > > [root@brad /root]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipsec restart > ipsec_setup: Stopping FreeS/WAN IPsec... > ipsec_setup: /usr/lib/ipsec/klipsdebug: Trouble openning PF_KEY family > socket wi > th error: Unknown file open error 97. Please report as much detail as > possible > to development team. > ipsec_setup: /usr/lib/ipsec/eroute: Trouble openning PF_KEY family socket > with e > rror: Unknown file open error 97. Please report as much detail as possible > to d > evelopment team. > ipsec_setup: /usr/lib/ipsec/spi: Trouble openning PF_KEY family socket with > erro > r: Unknown file open error 97. Please report as much detail as possible to > deve > lopment team. > ipsec_setup: Starting FreeS/WAN IPsec 1.91... > ipsec_setup: /lib/modules/2.2.19-7.0.8smp/misc/ipsec.o: kernel-module > version mi > smatch > ipsec_setup: /lib/modules/2.2.19-7.0.8smp/misc/ipsec.o was compiled for > kerne > l version 2.2.19-7.0.8 > ipsec_setup: while this kernel is version 2.2.19-7.0.8smp. > ipsec_setup: /lib/modules/2.2.19-7.0.8smp/misc/ipsec.o: insmod > /lib/modules/2.2. > 19-7.0.8smp/misc/ipsec.o failed > ipsec_setup: /lib/modules/2.2.19-7.0.8smp/misc/ipsec.o: insmod ipsec failed > ipsec_setup: kernel appears to lack KLIPS > [root@brad /root]# > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gordon Rowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Greg Zartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Darrell May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "e-smith-devinfo" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:38 PM > Subject: Re: FW: [e-smith-devinfo] Samba add user fragment > > > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 06:07:35PM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > [...] > > > I believe this fragment should simply read: > > > domain admin group = domain_admins (or something like that) > > > > > > This mirrors the current Microsoft Networks service. > > > > So if gregz and gordonr are nominated as local admins, we would need to > > - create a group "domain_admins" > > - add gordonr and gregz to that group > > - specify the group on the RHS of "domain admin group" > > > > We have a chicken&egg problem there... > > > > We have toyed with the idea of a "sysadmin" group which could be used > > for this sort of thing. We use it for the sudoers file, for example. > > > > > [...] > > > After doing this, things are working better (at least the > > > software guys aren't complaining), but now I'm not "standard" with the > rest > > > of the e-smith folks.... > > > > Please send me (directly) your updated script - it was stripped when > > you posted it to the list. > > > > > 3) I haven't had a chance to study all of yours and Darrel's discussion > > > today, but I do what to say that in my opinion the smb.conf file should > be > > > as simply as possible. > > > > Absolutely. I want to remove all comments, and default values. > > > > > [...] > > > Here is how I think the smb.conf file should look: > > > > > > [11workgroup] > > > workgroup = workgroup > > > [...] > > > > We are close to that now - there are still some commented out parameters, > > but I will be hiding those in a moment. I have not added the [11workgroup] > > comments as there is a one-to-one match between parameters and fragment > > names. > > > > > [...] > > > Incidentally, I feel that I could quite easily write a perl script that > > > could verify if a given fragment duplicates a default value in samba. I > > > think it would be quite easily to structure this as a function that > could be > > > called when the fragments are being expanded. > > > [...] > > > > If you write such a script, please provide it and we can add it to the RPM > > for verification purposes. In the meantime, please expand smb.conf from > > the new RPM and let me know if you see any default parameters which can > > be dropped. > > > > Gordon > > -- > > Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > VP Engineering > > Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com > > Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com > > > > > > -- > > Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues > > Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Archives by mail and > http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org > > > > > -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
