On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:51:30AM -0000, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > IIRC, during my research I found references stating: > > NT/2K should not use the home directory for profiles and NT/2K should not > use a hidden .directory.
Are you able to dig these up? This configuration seems to work correctly. I have seen various versions of the Samba docs, where the details in "logon home" and "logon path" have changed many times over the releases. > [...] > IIRC, I reported these to devinfo and then changed my template fragments > accordingly. Sure thing. Others on the list strongly urged one profiles subdirectory, shared between all Windows versions. We will not ship with a world-writable profiles directory, and I would rather avoid creating a directory per-user under the profiles share. > [...Dangling Z:...] > I feel this should be cause for concern. This references a failure to > set one or more of the environment and registries entries involved in the > internal NT/2K Home Directory parameters. Sure. This only seems to happen on Win2K. It does not happen for me on NT. It may be a Win2K service pack thing. Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
